A trial that threatens the freedoms of todes

If the anti Catalan inquisition is imposed, will try to make progress on the entire Spanish State. Beyond the obscurantism that involves show trial al process, enlightens the bowels of government, the regime and the system. The-parliamentary monarchical regime of '78 was molded by Francoism, it's nothing new. Even so, appreciate how judges move, State attorneys and prosecutors continue to amaze.

Prosecutors misrepresenting evidence presented themselves. They resort to partial cuts that alter content, both written and visual documents. When interpellate wrong with dates, the charges, events, They ask questions that include responses and present "evidence" that do not correspond to what was advertised. And Twitter or re-tweeted that selected as incriminating, only they call peaceful mobilization, It is indicating that that question is the right to protest.

They do not seek the truth but to prove that there was "Violent rebellion, sedition and embezzlement ". Were only violent police and Civil Guard, they clubbed people sitting or standing with arms raised whose "crime" was wanting to vote on 1O.

The complaint and advocates an argument synced: "Violence was not the responsibility of the Civil Guard executed a court order to prevent an illegal referendum. It is the fault of "human walls" that stood its target, submitted by political leaders ". It is a hypocritical and deceitful statement.

…appreciate how judges move, State attorneys and prosecutors continue to amaze.

During the first days the judge authorized Marchena defenses reproduce video evidence, then prevented for millions of Spaniards did not see "similar images" showing peaceful Catalan beaten by police. It is no coincidence that the PP leaders have boasted judges handle backroom, after all considers the Chief Justice his confidence man in justice. Judges respond to political power that exalts and not the population that would have to elect them by direct vote.

Televising the trial is causing doubts. Prosecutors judges and state attorneys Are improvised or a tactic? Do they have an "ace" up his sleeve or do not have solid evidence? What is apparent is superficiality or lack of one who knows that the verdict is already written? It can not yet adamantly respond.

The bottom line is that basic rights are being violated and must report it, Jordi como hizo it Cuixart, Of all the president Presa de Culture: "... I am a political prisoner. After 500 days in jail my priority is not released from prison. My priority is to report the attack there, the violation of rights in Catalonia and throughout the Spanish state. "

Another theme is the outrageous inability of the accused to express themselves in Catalan, evil pronouncement of their names and others mentioned. Coming from a State authority and scaffolding attacks that language is very difficult to think that it is innocent mistakes.

Eulàlia Reguant and Antonio Baños de la CUP refused to answer questions from VOX, being a group of extreme right, racist and sexist.

And it does not end here: VOX is leading the prosecution. The far right makes questioningly of political leaders, social and cultural democratically elected. The defendants and their witnesses left seated protest, which reached its peak when Eulàlia Reguant and Antonio Baños de la CUP refused to answer questions from VOX, being a group "Extreme right, racist and sexist ". After putting it, Witnesses were expelled from the room by Judge Marchena, they announced the implementation of 2.500 euro fine each and within 5 Days for “retrain” before being denounced by “grave disobedience”.

The show trial is conducted with the approval of the King, Pedro Sánchez (PSOE), Pablo Casado (PP) and Albert Rivera (Cs), alongside other menial regime. We insist: the MP-'78 monarchical regime molded Franco is exhausted, You can not provide any progressive social and political problems leaving Spain. the convening of a Constituent Assembly Free and Sovereign is necessary to change everything.

Also they appear at the trial or require evidence confirming the balance of the policies implemented by the protagonists at the time. On the one hand, is the cynicism of the former PP government expressed in the statements of those most responsible for the implementation of 155: the former president Mariano Rajoy, the vice president and comptroller of Catalunya Soraya Sanchez de Santamaria and former Interior Minister Juan Zoido.

Rajoy repeatedly refused, any possible negotiations with former Govern Catalan. The next day, he president Iñigo Urkullo (PNV), he denied. In a statement to "a lime and sand" , He described in detail his attempts to mediate between Rajoy and Puigdemont. The three policy makers were "passing the ball" each other. They put the cassette "I do not know" When they asked about the organization, implementation and consequences of repressive operations, discharging responsibilities at the controls of the police and Civil Guard. We'll see what Colonel repressor Diego Perez de los Cobos says about.

Mobilized Catalans are a great example to follow in defense of democratic freedoms, the rejection of authoritarianism and when to say "Self-determination is not a crime".

Former Finance Minister Cristobal Montoro reaffirmed that there was embezzlement because "There was intention to do so" Y "If someone opens a public place for an illegal act, how there will be no misappropriation ". Earlier he had said that the Government I had not spent “one euro” in Referendum.

Sobran reasons not recognize the bourgeois state the power to prosecute and imprison those who defend the right to self-determination, the mobilization and democratic participation. Demand the release of political prisoners is a matter of principle.

On the other hand, policies have ratified JxCAT, PDeCat and ERC during the process: the desire to compensate for the enforcement of court orders with popular pressure, characterization 1-O as a great democratic feat of symbolic character, like the Declaration of Independence. There will be an opportunity to exchange views on.

Whatever, The trial continues. It requires further develop the broadest unity of action in mobilizing and general strike for freedom of political prisoners, exiles and their acquittal. Mobilized Catalans are a great example to follow in defense of democratic freedoms todes, rejection of authoritarianism and when said "Self-determination is not a crime".