Argentina: From the proscriptive ruling to the call "Argentina with Cristina". What really takes?

The days go by since the Supreme Court issued its ruling by ratifying the condemnation of CFK, proscribing his candidacy and giving way to his next arrest. Since then there are different positions about why all this is happening and what we have to do. There are debates about what Peronism proposes, that expresses his project and his march of political support to CFK. There are even different looks inside the left. We share our vision.

By: MST National Directorate in Fitu

Reasons and actors of a failure that we repudiate

Talk about the ruling of the Supreme Court, It necessarily implies locating it within the political intentionality of the establishment, of the most concentrated political and economic power of the AEA and the AMCHAM in alliance with much of the media power, of powerful economic interests and part of bourgeois politicians, Macrism among others, that need to clear any uncertainty from the horizon and require that in the future, only sectors extremely related to their current interests, are within the political options in dance.

The acceleration in how the Court resolution was taken by itself of this objective. It is not a ruling that seeks justice nor even less attack corruption. It is a proscriptive and authoritarian ruling that responds centrally to reactionary political interests. That is why we reject it and repudiate it, in turn, placing it within a general political context.

We are not facing an isolated fact, It is a political decision that becomes a new advance in authoritarian sense, of a justice addicted to power that is part of a political regime that since the assumption of Milei has been pretending to cut off a whole series of social and democratic rights to the majorities, by antipiquetes protocol force, DN, persecutions to social fighters, Head to the salary, Abandonment of Social Assistance Plans, Attempt to restricted the right to strike, attacks on journalists, greater repression, lies campaigns and incitement to violence in networks through Trolls, and other dire initiatives ongoing. These are the real and central problems suffered by the majority of the population. To all this came to join the court ruling.

Essence, role and responsibilities of the PJ

This general complaint we make about justice, His proscriptive ruling and the most concentrated bourgeois political power, It does not prevent us from holding a deep criticism of the PJ and the role of CFK itself. On the contrary, the ruling and everything that is happening reaffirm the need to question all the political scaffolding of the group's capitalist regime, of which the PJ, both when it is government and when it is opposition, has been and is an essential part. Peronism can be today, concentrated in the figure of Cristina, distanced from the economic objectives of that power. However, every time he governs he responds to an important sector of those bourgeois interests, and in fact in the last speeches prior to this ruling, CFK ratified to propose as a replacement variant within the current regime, with moderate and more to the center postures. Looking to give reliability and accepting to debate issues that are agenda of concentrated power, efficient state, labor modernization, In addition to clarifying that they would pay the illegitimate debt with the fund. Seeks to dialogue, coexist and agree with a central power that actually comes for everything, instead of facing it.

The honest intentionality of their working bases, to achieve social justice, economic independence and political sovereignty, They have remained an abyss of the proposals of the leaders of all the wings of the PJ, que no proponen nada que vaya en sentido de un proyecto independiente, Sovereign or emancipator. They propose some things certainly different from the atrocities of the ultra -rightist milei, But always within maintaining the capitalist status quo that does not touch the great interests, nor take social measures of magnitude or deep and structural changes, without which there is no possibility of solving the social problems of the great impoverished and precarious majorities.

At the same time the PJ, From the assumption of Milei, It has been from one way or another also responsible for what is happening. Not facing the libertarian project in a consequent way, neither inside nor out of Parliament and, even worse, With its governors being central actors of pacts with the national government and facilitators of the advanced of its project, with deputies and senators who respond by voting in favor of decisive laws of support to Milei. In PJ in a set, it has been handled from the beginning with the logic of criticizing but in the facts to make, speaking of the need to defeat it only in the presidential 2027. Therefore not promoting from its union and social force any real and forceful struggle plan.

In the middle of this whole harmful political strategy, The working population, Youth and middle sectors, You have to endure by the current government, long years of brutal adjustment, delivery, repression and steps towards a more authoritarian regime, that at the end of the road in the level of political rights, It also ends up hitting the CFK itself with this court ruling.

For all this our total confrontation to Milei since he assumed, And now our repudiation of judicial ruling and proscription, We express it from a critical and independent position of CFK and the PJ, who are representatives of a patron political project defender of this decadent capitalist system. For having these strategic differences, We did not give it political support before, nor do we give it to it now. We integrally denounce this ruling because we are consistent in the struggle for democratic rights. In all our history, Inside and outside of the country, We have defended the political right of leaders with whom we have deep differences, When they have been banned, persecuted or imprisoned. And we do it because we also defend the right of their bases and supporters to be able to express themselves politically without part of a partial and addicted to power to be prevented.

Why don't we go to the Argentine march with Cristina?

From this position and in the midst of reality we live, also develop debates and positions found in what to do now. As can be seen, The set of PJ leaders are ordered not by the fight against a whole plan and a regime, but only for the political defense of the CFK figure and the development of a mobilization under that only objective, on Wednesday 18, With the slogan "Argentina with Cristina”. A very partial and closed mobilization in form and content, completely dissociated with the population's central genuine claims and only focused on giving political support to Cristina.

mobilization, It will not even be done to try to defeat proscription or demand its freedom, if not then, como dice su líder, “Get to the right”And from there agreeing and negotiating in better conditions the possibility of a house arrest. In this way it will not be a progressive mobilization, but ordered by the political strategy of the PJ in search of new agreements and pacts, While repitsessing his electoral strategy without CFK as a candidate.

That is why we will not participate in this mobilization. The reality of the country, It makes other political objectives and other types of fighting measures necessary. First, Precisely because we are in a more general process of attacks on social and democratic rights, The struggle plan that is needed and the character of the measures has to start from the most felt demands of the working majority and youth, If we really want them to be massive and forceful. In this sense, Wednesday's call is biased and limited to those who politically support CFK, Something that seems very wrong.

Our fighting proposal is thoroughly and responds to the integrality of the problems raised and suffered by the majorities. Is to boost the largest mass unit on the street, With general strikes and coordinated and progressive actions, First for decent salaries, For retirement, For work, by the claw and public health, For science and education, In defense of our democratic rights and against proscription, And for the defeat of the entire Milei project and its increasingly authoritarian regime. That is why we are and will be part of all the unitary and genuine actions that unify these demands.

Debates on the left

On these important issues, Common postures are developed, for example to denounce and repudiate this court ruling, And there are also different positions inside the left front. For example, we consider the position of PTS partners wrong that from the day of the ruling are focusing all their policy and intervention on the need for a general strike against proscription, ordered in essence for that task, and not promoting a comprehensive policy that prioritizes claims and workers and popular needs and that joins the issue of proscription. In fact, they participated in a meeting at the headquarters of the PJ where criticizing that the march of the 18 Be closed to support CFK, But they also explain that they proposed: "A unitary and consistent struggle against proscription, emphasizing the demand for union centrals to convene an active national strike and a fight plan ”.

At times it is very important to be handled without being dragged by pressures from other regime parties, but defining a consequent and substantive policy. PTS companions are not acting like this. That is why they quickly decided to meet alone with CFK without mediating any exchange in the Fit-U, While the referent of his youth advertised at the same time the call to unity to La Cámpora, thus transferring to the runs the threshold of their own political contradictions. Remember that they have recently divided a 24 Massive March, with sectarian excuses and the falsehood that he could not leave in common because that was to go behind Peronism. A serious political mistake they made at that time, dividing a historical mobilization that was actually from all human rights organisms. Now unfortunately reinforce that error, committing another in the opposite direction, despair and respond unilaterally, Putting the center on the subject proscription and not to propose a struggle plan and stoppages that start for the set of workers' needs, popular and youth that exist to fight and mobilize.

The case of the labor party is equal or even more incoherent. También vienen de haber dividido un 24 Unitary and massive March with all human rights agencies because according to them it was to be functional to Peronism, But now they announce their participation in a march under the only slogan "Argentina with Cristina”, which is to give it political support and an important political error on your part. Because those who repudiate the Court's ruling and demand the freedom of CFK, We can do so thoroughly without any need to run behind actions at the service of the wrong political objectives of the PJ, que son claramente diferentes a los de la izquierda anticapitalista y socialista.

We also add that colleagues do not respond to another of the concerns of the working population as a whole, that is given by the disbelief and fed up with all the old games, including PJ. There are millions of honest workers and young people who see that there is corruption from the State throughout different governments to the current. However, neither the PTS and the poe hierarchize this issue or propose how to do so that everything is really investigated. In our case, The complaint of the proscriptive failure against CFK and its detention, It does not prevent us from saying that corruption is a structural and evident scourge of all capitalist governments, that the people deserve to know the truth above all. And that is why an independent investigative commission is needed that goes until the end, Faced with complaints about Peronism governments, Macrismo and Milei. Unfortunately the Left Front so far does not boost this common proposal. We insist again on the importance of doing so.

Win the streets and strengthen an alternative

summarizing, We return to express our repudiation to the court ruling and the entire plan of economic power, media and ultra -rightists who govern the country. We are in favor of the greatest struggle and unity of action on the street, of the wider single front that we can build, To defeat all this adjustment and removal plan for social and democratic rights. We are therefore due to the impulse to all street actions that condense and coordinate the genuine claims of the entire population together with the complaint to the proscription and defense of democratic freedoms.

At the same time at the moment, respecting the political beliefs of other companions, We do not believe that the solution is to lie down on the PJ and its project, Not even in the midst of this proscription. Nor consider that the solution is to invent broad fronts for democracy, conducted by the same as always and with center programs. Faced with the brutality of the Milei project, In addition to a massive and consistent struggle, It is necessary to strengthen a new political alternative, With an anti -capitalist and socialist background program, and open to the participation of thousands of colleagues.

The Left Front has the opportunity and responsibility, If you get out of your current stadium of being just a limited electoral front, and be encouraged to take serious and solid steps towards a great political call, To organize thousands and postulate in the country, In the midst of this great crisis, A really alternative voice for millions. From the MST as members of the Left Front, We invite thousands of colleagues from the Political and Social Left, to the set of the militancy of the FIT-U and to workers and young people from the bases of Peronism, to discuss thoroughly, democratically and in common on all these issues, in which the future of the country is put into play.