mortgages: That supreme embarrassment pay banks!
The lobby of a handful of bankers prevailed over the interests of customers. The Supreme Court had differences on the tax on mortgages. Millions of people expected it would define who belonged payments: banks or customers. The plenum defined 15 a 13 for paying customers.
It is a shameful failure. Make 15 days a Board of six judges had set the opposite view. Again institutions give priority to saving regime banking thousand million euros, wrong, customers will have to pay.
Since the capitalist economic crisis that began in the 2008, the measures taken by the governments of the PP and PSOE and institutions guarantee the profits of businessmen and bankers. Employers highways and Bankia, are just two examples of a long list of favored.
This shameful failure proves again that justice favors the interests of the capitalist ruling political and economic power.
When it comes to increase pensions or salaries, there are always problems, whether the government accounts, Brussels constraints or negative IMF. Above for no money, below are for debts.
President Pedro Sanchez has announced that it will promote legislative reform to correct the Supreme Court and paying banks and said “Buying a home is a great plan of life that must have legal certainty.” Without nationalizing the banks and bring it under control users, they will again be harmed.
In addition to “legal security” what people need is the real possibility of access to homeownership. While the right to housing remains in the hands of banks, It will always be a business, subject to speculation and abuses.
a large popular mobilization is necessary to demand that this decision be annulled or become void, debts were yesterday, Today there are mortgages and tomorrow will be another topic that always allow them to continue gaining. You have to stop them hand Let him return to families the money already paid! Let banks pay what they owe! For a national income housing plan with a social quota accessible!
This shameful failure proves again that justice favors the interests of the capitalist ruling political and economic power. Why you not have a political decision to settle with the people? Because they respond to the interests of the bourgeoisie.
There are two very specific situations, today with the PSOE government, It is this sentence, so, What do the policies that have executive power? Here are the customers and non-financial institutions which have to continue paying tribute.
And a few months ago with the PP government was the sentence of the pack, What mattered policies on gender violence, if the end 5 rapists end up on the street? What does it matter that rebellion and sedition charges for the Catalan political prisoners be invented? They will not have fair trials because they want during years in jail.
... must be implemented direct election of judges by popular vote, ensure mechanisms of social control and regulate revocation of the judges ...
In this we must be categorical, to ensure popular sovereignty in justice, must stipulate that the election and removal of judges, as well as oversight of judicial proceedings are subject to social control.
Specific, we must implement the direct election of judges by popular vote, ensure mechanisms of social control and regulate recall of judges and finally, review and actually implement jury trials, and also there is a gender-sensitive training for judges, judges and prosecutors. These are measures to implement a real court democratization, that is reactionary and acts by subordination to power.
The regime of '78, governments of the PP and PSOE holding bipartisanship and the monarchy can not offer solutions democratic and social background. Only cut freedoms, trample self-determination and guarantee capitalist profits.
We believe that imposes the call for the broadest unity of action in mobilizing, among all Republicans considered, democratic, progressive or leftist, to demand the convening of a Constituent Assembly Free and Sovereign; in which the workers and the people can debate and decide on these and other issues affecting everyday life and determine the future.
Laura Jaén
